There are the games for free. Some of them succeed, some of them fail, and many of them either turn out to be scams or get hacked and cost their users millions of dollars in cryptocurrency, however, there is no hint that blockchain technology is not going to go away. To get to what happens, we invested so much money to promise what is available for monetary purposes, at this point it seems impossible to deter corporations from inundating us with monetary funds, merely to see what has been done.
In order to know that, Climate Replay created its NFT Guide. It gives you an explanation of what does not exist with NFTs and what developers, publishers and players can do to fix them. As reported by Bloomberg, Climate Replay is a group from the Minecraft developer Mojang with the help of Xbox Game Studios, the International Game Developers Association and leading climatologists to explain why NFTs are bad for the climate and how to implement them in a game that might actually be fun.
It’s a Classic Example Of Whats to Come For The NFT Games.
“Games give us hope in a much less uncertain world.” They help us unlock our creative potential and free us from real-world constraints, physical, financially or otherwise,” wrote Climate Replay.
“No more NFTs, which are the result of many digital ownership forms, serve, in their current state, as a real opposite purpose their value defined completely by artificial scarcity, speculation and optimisation of power. It’s important for the global gaming community, planet, and society as a whole to act responsibly and effectively as a means of protecting human rights and to use blockchains, such as NFTs, only if they bring measurable value to games and their communities and then in such a way that it considers the potential social and environmental impacts.
With its upcoming document, Climate Replay offers a framework for developers and publishers to follow for implementing NFTs in future games to be better for both the players and the environment. The seven points and two sub-points are a premise of a game that: “Do you do that with these seven points?”
- What values players and friends share.
- Doesn’t use technology that is intentionally inefficient, which has concrete and real consequences on the environment.
- Doesn’t embrace artificial scarcity to generate speculative value.
- Does not depend on unregulated, volatile cryptocurrency?
- Does not benefit prematurely adopters, or rich players.
- It’s not perpetuating one of the negative facets of the Play-to-Earn model that are neither reproduced nor perpetuated: the number one factor:
- Informal Jobs
- The primary aim of the game is to go from enjoyment to making money.
- Is done in advance and took serious risks from studio members.
To date, a list of a hard mountain would make it difficult. Virtually all NFT games today are built on blockchains to make scarcity, use unregulated cryptocurrency and have the 11th biggest energy source in the world. And that doesn’t mean that any blockchain is bad, or that the future replica and implementation of this technology can’t be better. By following these rules, Climate Replay wisely tells us how to build a better blockchain-based game.
About the author Close
